<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" version="4.3.6" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.3.6.xsd">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>_1737185572</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>20250118073252000</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>Rovedar</depositor_name>
      <email_address>Daryoushbabazadeh@gmail.com</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>Rovedar</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata>
        <full_title>Farm Animal Health and Nutrition</full_title>
        <abbrev_title> Farm Anim. Health Nutr.</abbrev_title>
        <issn media_type="electronic">2980-7905</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>12</month>
          <day>07</day>
          <year>2024</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>3</volume>
        </journal_volume>
        <issue>4</issue>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" publication_type="full_text" metadata_distribution_opts="any">
        <titles>
          <title>Effects of Different Dietary Fat Sources on Oxidative Stress Parameters in Broiler Chickens</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first" language="en">
            <given_name>Jivini</given_name>
            <surname>Nwuku Aji</surname>
            <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-8611</ORCID>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional" language="en">
            <given_name>Ademu</given_name>
            <surname>Lawrence</surname>
            <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1806-8508</ORCID>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional" language="en">
            <given_name>Obun</given_name>
            <surname>Cletus Otu</surname>
            <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-1206</ORCID>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1">
          <jats:p>Introduction: Certain types of dietary fats may elevate the generation of free radicals, resulting in oxidative stress and potential cellular damage. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of high-energy diets derived from various fat sources on broiler chicken welfare and production.
Materials and methods: A total of 216-day-old unsexed Arbor Acre broiler chickens were assigned to four treatment groups.  The groups, including control, beef tallow (high energy diet animal source, HEDAS), palm oil (high energy diet plant source, HEDPS), and low energy diet (LED), each consisting of three replicates with 18 birds, were investigated in a completely randomized design over 42 days.
Results: According to the results, the HEDPS group had the highest live weight, while the HEDAS group indicated the highest dressing percentage. Significant differences were noted in alanine transaminase and alanine phosphatase in the treatment group compared to the control group. Cholesterol levels were significantly high in the HEDAS group and LDL levels were the lowest compared to the control group. The HEDAS group also exhibited the highest triglyceride level compared to other treatments. The HDL levels were higher in the LED and HEDPS groups compared to the HEDAS group. The VLDL concentration was significantly higher in the HEDAS group in comparison with other groups.
Conclusion: The HEDPS diet positively affected serum biochemistry and carcass characteristics, highlighting its potential in broiler chicken welfare and production.       </jats:p>
        </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>12</month>
          <day>07</day>
          <year>2024</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>72</first_page>
          <last_page>77</last_page>
        </pages>
        <fr:program name="fundref"/>
        <ai:program xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators">
          <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ai:license_ref>
        </ai:program>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.58803/fahn.v3i4.61</doi>
          <resource>https://fahn.rovedar.com/index.php/FAHN/article/view/61</resource>
          <collection property="crawler-based">
            <item crawler="iParadigms">
              <resource>https://fahn.rovedar.com/index.php/FAHN/article/download/61/88</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
          <collection property="text-mining">
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://fahn.rovedar.com/index.php/FAHN/article/download/61/88</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="2521">
            <doi>10.3382/ps/pev094</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2522">
            <doi>10.3390/jcm6020022</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2523">
            <doi>10.3390/biology8020030</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2524">
            <unstructured_citation>Hansford RG, Hogue BA, and Mildaziene V. Dependence of H2O2 formation by rat heart mitochondria on substrate availability and donor age. J BioenergBiomembr. 1997; 9: 230-473.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2525">
            <doi>10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00317-8</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2526">
            <unstructured_citation>Pamplona R, and Costantini D. Molecular and structural antioxidant defenses against oxidative stress in animals. Am J Physiol Regul</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2527">
            <doi>10.1152/ajpregu.00034.2011</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2528">
            <doi>10.17226/2114</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2529">
            <doi>10.3923/ijps.2010.1027.1030</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2530">
            <doi>10.1093/ps/81.3.382</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2531">
            <unstructured_citation>Min B, and Ahn DU. Mechanism of lipid peroxidation in meat and meat products - A review. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2005; 4(2): 9-11.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2532">
            <doi>10.3382/japr.2011-00392</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2533">
            <doi>10.1079/WPS200445</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2534">
            <doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.108025</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2535">
            <unstructured_citation>Association of official analytical chemist (AOAC) (2010). Official methods of analysis of association of official analytical chemist. 18th Edition, Washington, D.C.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2536">
            <doi>10.1093/ps/80.1.71</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2537">
            <unstructured_citation>Azman MA, Konar V, and Seven PT. Effects of different dietary fat sources on growth performances and carcass fatty acid composition of broiler chickens. Rev Med Vet. 2004; 155(5): 278-286.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2538">
            <unstructured_citation>Nayebpor M, Hashemi A, and Farhoman P. Influence of soybean oil on growth performance, carcass properties, abdominal fat deposition and humoral immune response in male broiler chickens. J Anim Vet Adv. 2007; 6(11): 1317-1322. Available at: https://docsdrive. com/?pdf=medwelljournals/javaa/2007/1317-1322.pdf</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2539">
            <doi>10.1111/j.1439-0396.2008.00803.x</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2540">
            <doi>10.4314/joafss.v5i1.45965</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2541">
            <doi>10.2174/138920210791110960</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2542">
            <unstructured_citation>Shahryar HA, Nobar RS, Lak A, and Lotfi A. Research work and carcass characteristics study and effect of dietary supplemented canola oil and poultry fat KD on the performance and carcass characterizes of broiler compiled the data and carried out the statistical chickens.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2543">
            <unstructured_citation>Curr Res J Biol Sci. 2011; 3(4): 388-392. Available at: https://maxwellsci.com/print/crjbs/v3-388-392.pdf</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2544">
            <unstructured_citation>Nobakht A, Tabatbaei S, and Khodaei S. Effects of different sources and levels of vegetable oils on performance, carcass traits and accumulation of vitamin E in breast meat of broilers. Curr Res J Biol Sci. 2011; 3: 601./print/crjbs/v3-388-392.pdf</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2545">
            <unstructured_citation>Anjum MI, Mirza IH, Khan AG, and Azim A. Effect of fresh versus oxidized soybean oil on growth performance, organs weights and meat quality of broiler chicks. Pak Vet J. 2004; 4: 173-178.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2546">
            <doi>10.1007/s13105-016-0468-6</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2547">
            <doi>10.1155/2016/2391592</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2548">
            <doi>10.1038/ijo.2017.225</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2549">
            <doi>10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.022</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2550">
            <doi>10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.10.004</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2551">
            <doi>10.1136/pmj.79.932.307</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2552">
            <doi>10.5251/abjna.2011.2.8.1160.1165</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2553">
            <doi>10.3923/ijps.2013.726.734</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2554">
            <doi>10.4314/jasem.v5i1.54966</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2555">
            <unstructured_citation>Svoboda M, Luskova V, Drastichova, and Zdabek V. The effects of diazino non haematological indices of common carp (Cyprinus</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2556">
            <doi>10.2754/avb200170040457</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2557">
            <doi>10.4314/ajtcam.v1i1.31092</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2558">
            <unstructured_citation>Friedman LS, Martin P, and Munoz SJ. Liver function test and objective evaluation of the patient with liver disease. In: Zak D, Boyer TD, editors. Hepatology: A text book of liver disease. 3rd edition. 1996; p. 791-833.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2559">
            <doi>10.1577/1548-8446(1992)017&lt;0006:EOTFTC&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2560">
            <doi>10.14202/vetworld.2016.192-198</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2561">
            <doi>10.5455/vetworld.2013.159-162</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2562">
            <doi>10.1080/09712119.2017.1337580</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2563">
            <doi>10.14814/phy2.12708</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2564">
            <unstructured_citation>Lipid research clinics program. Lipid and lipoprotein analysis. Vol. 1, in manual of laboratory operations. U.S. department of health and human services, NIH publication Bethesda; 1974. p. 75–628.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2565">
            <doi>10.1039/C8FO00986D</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2566">
            <doi>10.1111/asj.12759</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2567">
            <doi>10.1017/S000711451400155X</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2568">
            <doi>10.3382/ps/pey434</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2569">
            <doi>10.3382/ps/pew469</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2570">
            <doi>10.1093/jn/127.3.509S</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="2571">
            <unstructured_citation>Jeannine PS. Carcass dressing percentage and cooler shrink. Michigan State University Extension. Meat marketing and processing. Adapted from principles of meat science, 4th Edition, 2001. Available at: https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/carcass_dressing_percentage_and_cooler_shrink</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
