<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" version="4.3.6" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.3.6.xsd">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>_1694676193</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>20230914072313000</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>Rovedar</depositor_name>
      <email_address>Daryoushbabazadeh@gmail.com</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>Rovedar</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata>
        <full_title>Farm Animal Health and Nutrition</full_title>
        <abbrev_title> Farm Anim. Health Nutr.</abbrev_title>
        <issn media_type="electronic">2980-7905</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>08</month>
          <day>28</day>
          <year>2023</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>2</volume>
        </journal_volume>
        <issue>3</issue>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" publication_type="full_text" metadata_distribution_opts="any">
        <titles>
          <title>Effects of Breed Differences and Parities on Milk Proximate and Mineral Compositions in Nigerian Cattle Breeds under the Extensive System</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first" language="en">
            <given_name>Ayuba</given_name>
            <surname>Dauda</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional" language="en">
            <given_name>Philip</given_name>
            <surname>John Ahmadu</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional" language="en">
            <given_name>Yusuf</given_name>
            <surname>Idi</surname>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1">
          <jats:p>Introduction: Milk production from indigenous cattle breeds in Nigeria represents an important component of the agribusiness sector of the smallholder economy with great economic, nutritional, and social implications.
Materials and methods: Three farms in the study location were chosen and 90 cows of three breeds of Sokoto Gudali, White Fulani, and Red Bororo in each farm, were used for the present study (total 270 cows). The cows of each farm were chosen equally based on parity (1-3). In this study, 5 ml of milk sample was collected from each cow in the morning for analysis of milk proximate and mineral composition. The analytical parameters included protein, fat, ash, moisture, calcium, iron, phosphorus, and sodium in milk.  
Results: The results revealed that the parity of the three breeds significantly affected the milk proximate and mineral compositions. In the first parity, White Fulani cow milk was significantly higher in milk protein at 4.52%, followed by Red Bororo and Sokoto Gudali at 3.97% and 3.91%, respectively. Sokoto Gudali was significantly higher in milk fat at 3.18%, followed by Red Bororo at 2.89% and White Fulani at 2.76%. White Fulani was significantly higher in milk moisture at 84.56%, followed by Sokoto Gudali at 82.72% and Red Bororo at 81.13%. Red Bororo was significantly higher in milk phosphorus at 375.62 mg/L and sodium at 71.22 mg/L. In the second parity, only moisture, calcium, and sodium differed significantly among the breeds. White Fulani and Red Bororo were significantly higher in moisture at 83.75% and 83.43%, respectively. On the other hand, Sokoto Gudali were significantly higher in calcium at 614.94 mg/L and sodium at 68.76 mg/L. White Fulani and Red Bororo had significantly lower calcium levels at 560.50 mg/L and 555.42 mg/L, respectively. On the other hand, White Fulani had significantly lower levels of sodium at 61.25 mg/L. In the third parity, White Fulani was significantly higher in milk protein at 4.16%, calcium at 611.48 mg/L, and sodium at 75.33 mg/L. Red Bororo was significantly higher in fat at 3.75% and calcium at 626.99 mg/L. Sokoto Gudali was significantly higher in sodium at 75.36 mg/L. In overall, first parity cows were significantly higher in milk protein at 4.11%. Milk fat, ash, calcium, and sodium increased with number of parity. The third parity was significantly higher in milk fat (3.29%), ash (0.43%), calcium (599.58 mg/L), and sodium (71.77 mg/L) levels.
Conclusion: By increasing parity in Nigerian cows, the chemical composition of milk will be improved which can be considered for future studies on these breeds.</jats:p>
        </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>08</month>
          <day>29</day>
          <year>2023</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>51</first_page>
          <last_page>55</last_page>
        </pages>
        <fr:program name="fundref"/>
        <ai:program xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators">
          <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ai:license_ref>
        </ai:program>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.58803/fahn.v2i3.29</doi>
          <resource>https://fahn.rovedar.com/index.php/FAHN/article/view/29</resource>
          <collection property="crawler-based">
            <item crawler="iParadigms">
              <resource>https://fahn.rovedar.com/index.php/FAHN/article/download/29/37</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
          <collection property="text-mining">
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://fahn.rovedar.com/index.php/FAHN/article/download/29/37</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="1167">
            <doi>10.58803/Fahn.2023.2.1.03</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1168">
            <doi>10.3892/ijfn.2022.28</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1169">
            <doi>10.3168/jds.2012-5820</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1170">
            <unstructured_citation>Boichard D, and Brochard M. New phenotype for new breeding</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1171">
            <doi>10.1017/S1751731112000018</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1172">
            <unstructured_citation>Oladapo AF, and Ogunekunn TO. Quality assessment of fresh milk from traditionally managed Nigerian Bunaji and bokoloji breeds of cattle. Pac J Sci Technol. 2015; 16(1): 280-285.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1173">
            <doi>10.51791/njap.v16i.1903</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1174">
            <unstructured_citation>Adesina K. Effect of breed on the composition of cow milk under traditional management practices in Ado-Ekiti Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manag. 2012; 16(1): 55-59. Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jasem/article/view/90752</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1175">
            <doi>10.1590/0103-8478cr20180123</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1176">
            <doi>10.5897/AJB11.2940</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1177">
            <unstructured_citation>Alade NK, Abbaya HY, and Raji AO. Influences of season, species and interaction on milk composition of ruminant animals in maiduguri, Borno State Nigeria. Adv Agric Sci Eng Sci. 2013; 3(10): 1195-1204. Available at: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20143136322</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1178">
            <unstructured_citation>Dandare SU, Ezeonwumelu IJ, and Abubakar MG. Comparative analysis of nutrient composition of milk from different breeds of cows. Eur J Sci Appl Eng Sci Res. 2014; 3(2): 33-36.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1179">
            <doi>10.4314/sajas.v43i5.3</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1180">
            <unstructured_citation>Aminat R, Atinuke A, Chineke C.A. Milk Characterization between White Fulani and Sokoto Gudali Cattle Breeds in Nigeria. Int. J. of Adv. in Eng. and Manag.2022; 4(3): 1302-1305. DOI: 10.35629/5252-040313021305</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1181">
            <unstructured_citation>Shuiep ES, Eltaher HA, and El-Zubeir IEM. Effect of stage of lactation and order of parity on milk composition and daily milk yield among local and crossbred cows in south Durfur State, Sudan. SUST J Agric Vet Sci. 2016; 17(2): 1-14.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1182">
            <unstructured_citation>Yadav SP, Sikka P, Kumar D, Sarkar S, Pandey AK, Yadav PS, et al. Variations in milk constituents during different parity and seasons in murrah Buffaloes. Indian J Anim Sci. 2013; 83(7): 747-751. Available at: http://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/handle/123456789/28323</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1183">
            <doi>10.1002/9780470277812</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1184">
            <unstructured_citation>Dauda A. Expression of Alpha casein s1 and DGAT 1 gene and it and their association with milk composition and amino acid profiling of three breeds of cattle under extensive management in Nigeria. PhD Thesis Department of Animal Science University of Calabar. 2021</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1185">
            <unstructured_citation>Tesfiye A. Calcium requirement in relation to milk fever for high yield cows. A review. Journal homepage. J Fac Food Eng. 2019; 18(1): 27-35. Available at: http://fens.usv.ro/index.php/FENS/article/view/626</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1186">
            <doi>10.1017/S0022029998002970</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1187">
            <doi>10.1016/j.lwt.2011.12.025</doi>
          </citation>
          <citation key="1188">
            <unstructured_citation>‏</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
